After a long break from the series, I'm back with my first Vintage Dinosaur Art post in almost two years. Inspired by the cartoony style of Marc's post on
Dinosaurs! A Spot-the-Difference Puzzle Book, I scanned a recent acquisition of my own,
Travels with Dinosaurs. The book itself has scant information about the publication, but searching the web leads me to a publication date of 1997, making this not-quite-vintage, but it certainly is in spirit, so off we go.
The book was written by children's author Vezio Melgari and illustrated by Giovanni Giannini and Violayne Hulné. There's sadly no indication how Giannini and Hulné collaborated on the illustrations, which strongly resemble the work of
Richard Scarry. Melgari's story is about a group of young animals - mainly of the canine persuasion, with a cat or two thrown in the mix - who are taken on a virtual reality trip through time by the Professor Alfred S. Wolfsbane, "specialist in several sciences and wizard of the computer world." It was the nineties! Of course, for our purposes, we're more concerned with how the dinosaurs are presented than we are in the story.
The first trip is to visit the "floating giants," AKA sauropods. Though
Apatosaurus is depicted in its classic mid-century habit of standing half-submerged in water, it is referred to by the correct name, and the text even makes reference to the obsolescence of "Brontosaurus". The spread is a good introduction to the book's primary color aesthetic and odd mix of outmoded and contemporary ideas, as well as its admirable dedication to including smaller fauna in the mix, generally well labeled, as in the fish swimming around the sauropods' legs here.
The sauropods of Travels with Dinosaurs: Apatosaurus, Diplodocus, and Brachiosaurus.
Next up are various hadrosaurs, singled out for their "strange heads", since the variety of hadrosaur headgear has always been a popular focal point of picture books. Most interesting here is "Anatosaurus", which by the late nineties had been officially folded into
Edmontosaurus for about a decade. It's standing in a familiar Knightian bipedal position (and creeping up on a tree fern in an unsavory way). The landscape combines the old and new again, repeating the old trope of barren, volcano-populated landscapes but also nodding to the Cretaceous flourishing of angiosperms.
The strange heads: Edmontosaurus FKA Anatosaurus, Corythosaurus, and Parasaurolophus
Thyreophorans get their spotlight next.
Stegosaurus is featured front and center, as expected, rearing on two legs and munching on foliage,
an old tradition.
Velociraptor makes an appearance, menaced by
Ankylosaurus and high-tailing it back to Asia (and presumably its own time, a couple million years previous). At least it's recognizable as a velociraptor-ish animal, rather than a generic post-JP raptor.
Kentrosaurus is stripped of its teeth, which was never the case; though its original description only included a single tooth, and only fragments of teeth or emerging teeth thereafter, I'm not sure that toothless
Kentrosaurus was ever a big theory - gladly corrected if it was.
Ankylosaurus, Kentrosaurus, and Stegosaurus represent Thyreophora
Appropriately enough,
Triceratops takes center stage for the ceratopsians, with fellow old standby horn-faces
Monoclonius and
Styracosaurus playing back up. Check out the pretty-well-rendered noggin morphology of the baby
Triceratops, huddled in the lower right-hand corner.
Styracosaurus, Triceratops, and Monoclonius, natch
The carnivores, appropriately enough, are represented by those twin titans of terror,
Tyrannosaurus and...
Iguanodon. Yeah,
Iguanodon, tearing into
Mosasaurus. Prof. Wolfsbane calls it "one of the largest carnivores... among the land dinosaurs," only bested by
Tyrannosaurus. I don't know where this came from, other than Louis Figuier's famous, anachronistic
Megalosaurus v. Iguanodon battle, in which it can safely be presumed that
Iguanodon is merely fighting for its life, not trying to nom on its opponent. If anyone knows of any other depictions of a predatory
Iguanodon, please let me know what I've missed. It's almost as if Melgari smooshed
Megalosaurus and
Iguanodon into a single wuzzlesaur, with the stereotypical skulking gait and predatory nature of the former and the thumb-spike of the latter. I love the glee on the face of Rexy, as if he's just thrilled that
Iguanodon has changed teams and wants in on the action.
The terrible predators, Tyrannosaurus and Iguanodon.
The book's pterosaurs were cast in the old-school, leathery-demon mold, with little attention paid to scale or temporal accuracy. And hey, since we're at the seaside,
Ichthyornis prepares for a water landing, and there's a typical
Hesperornis. Look at it dive.
"Hey, big bats!"
Archaeopteryx, in classic sparkleraptor garb, is relegated to a spread dedicated to various birds (and a couple tapirs). It's presumably the Cenozoic now, therefore we're green and fresh and inviting rather than volcanic and barren.
Palaelodus stands in the background, pink and misspelled. Prof. Wolfsbane's son Walt has gone missing, and some of his supposed friends choose to imagine him chased down by a ravenous
Tyrannosaurus, menaced by
Mastodonosaurus, or best of all, fed by
Brachiosaurus to
Mosasaurus. Poor Prof. Wolfsbane,
I can only imagine his reaction.
Birds, tapirs, and dark fantasies
The last spread I'll share is the "record breakers," in which dubious facts and stale old canards are transmitted to a willing and impressionable junior readership. Here, we learn that
Allosaurus was the "fiercest and most voracious" dinosaur, because science, and it certainly does seem excited by those jammie dodgers.
Ouranosaurus gets to have the longest crest,
Tanystropheus is lumped in with dinosaurs because why not, and golly:
Composognathus is the size of a chicken.
Science!
So to sum up: whimsical illustrations that combine old views, somewhat contemporary knowledge, and head-scratching inaccuracies. Had Melgari gone with a lighter adventure narrative that didn't purport to be an encyclopedia-lite, poetic license would have been understandable, but instead we have a book that is mostly memorable for its bizarre un-facts.